Weirdo Lib Wearing What Appears to Be a Luigi Mangione T-Shirt Attacks Trump...
Former Rolling Stone Contributing Editor Does Not Hold Back in Eviscerating Taylor Lorenz
Is This Trump's Best Line From the White House Easter Egg Roll?
The Left's Obsession With Clipping Pete Hegseth Is Bordering on Psychotic
Trump Won’t Get Tricked Into Sacrificing Pete Hegseth to the Democrats
The Questions Democrats Will Not Ask
Rogue Commanders, The Enemy Within
An Easter Weekend Filled With Manufactured Scandals From the Floppy-eared Media
When a Wrong Narrative Hides the Truth
Trump’s DHS and DOJ Are Going After MS-13, Not Moms at School Board...
The World Needs People Day More Than Earth Day
The Savaging of the Climate Politico-Legal-Media Complex
The Moral Bankruptcy of a 'Day of Rage' and the Palestinian Legacy of...
MSNBC Hits Back At Gavin Newsom For Calling Deportation Of MS-13 Member A...
Tim Walz’s Daughter Claims Trump Would Have Deported Jesus, Lumping Him with MS-13
Tipsheet
Premium

Is Kamala's Glock Illegal?

AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster

Vice President Kamala Harris has made a thing out of the fact that she owns a gun. She holds it up, metaphorically, as a symbol that she can be trusted with our right to keep and bear arms. No one actually believes that, mind you, but she's sure trying just the same.

Not only has she failed to account for some of her anti-gun positions of the past, but a comment on a completely different subject may come back to bite her in the posterior.

Kamala Harris favors the legalization of marijuana. 

That's fine. She's entitled to her position on the topic. I don't disagree. While I despise the whole push to make it seem like pot does nothing bad and really is a wonder drug that undermines Big Pharma, I honestly don't care if people rot their brains so long as it's of their own volition.

But Harris has also acknowledged having used it in the past, which raises some interesting questions, questions Second Amendment attorney Matt Cubeiro is asking.

These are certainly fair questions.

For example, we know that Hunter Biden purchased a firearm during the same period he was using illicit drugs, according to his own memoir. That landed him in hot water.

With Harris, we don't quite have the same smoking gun – pardon the pun – but the question is most definitely a fair one.

Did Kamala Harris use illegal drugs around the time that she purchased her Glock?

It's a simple question. If she says she used it while in college and hasn't touched it since, no worries. If she used it around the time of the purchase or even afterward, she broke federal law.

Considering her history of locking up people for drugs and guns, it would be more than a little hypocritical to break federal gun control laws and expect a pass on it.

Of course, I don't know that we can accept any answer at face value, but this is one of those cases where she at least needs to lie about it. Give the answer that will keep her out of trouble and call it a day. I mean, it's not like lying is something new to her or the Democratic Party.

In 2019, she said her use was a long time ago, but that could mean just about anything. That's a matter of perspective. We also don't know precisely when she bought the Glock she keeps talking about.

Did the two coincide in some way? We don't know, but it's a question that needs to be asked, especially since it's only recently we learned she even had a gun. 

I'm not holding my breath on her answering the question, much less answering it honestly. She expects everyone to bow, scrape, and accept what she says as the gospel truth.

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement