The Stakes in Wisconsin's Supreme Court Race Are High. Here's Why.
Another Anti-Trump Media Narrative Is Showing No Effect With Voters
This Poll of American Jews About Trump and Israel Makes No Sense
Anti-Gunner Organization Just Made the Case for Trans-Identified People to Own Firearms
Here's What's at Stake for Republicans in Wisconsin's Supreme Court Elections
Iran Loads Up Missiles After Trump Issues Threat
Colorado Far From Finished Infringing on Gun Rights
More 'Extremely Dangerous Criminals' Have Been Sent to El Salvador
Patronis Poised for Quick Impact in Congress
Trump Applauds Markwayne Mullin's Sunday Show Appearance Delivering Masterclass on 'Signal...
The High Cost of Coastal Litigation: A Threat to Louisiana’s Economy and Trump’s...
DOGE Will Look Into Lawmakers Who Became 'Strangely Wealthy'
Another Poll Shows Democrats in Disarray Over How the Party Is Handling Trump
Trump's Answer to a Question About a Third-Term Is Sure to Trigger the...
Here’s Why the LA Times Is Suing Mayor Karen Bass
Tipsheet

Clarence Thomas Slams Supreme Court for Rejecting Pro-Life Free Speech Case

AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File

Conservative Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas expressed strong criticism after the highest court declined to hear a case involving pro-life activists and their free speech rights. In a rare public statement, Thomas condemned the decision, arguing that the Court's refusal to consider the case undermines fundamental First Amendment protections. The case in question involved activists challenging restrictions on their ability to express anti-abortion views, a matter Thomas believes the Court should have addressed to safeguard free speech amid increasing government regulations.

Advertisement

On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear two cases involving pro-life groups who challenged laws banning protests near abortion clinics. The Court rejected appeals from Coalition Life, or the "America's Largest Professional Sidewalk Counseling Organization," in New Jersey and Illinois. Both had appealed lower court rulings that dismissed their lawsuits. They argued that "buffer zones,” which were set in place after a previous Supreme Court decision in Colorado, keep patients from facing harassment. Thomas criticized the law, which was grounded in the 2000 Hill v. Colorado decision that upheld a similar law based on a "right to avoid unwelcome speech" under specific circumstances.

In a dissent, Thomas said he “would have taken this opportunity to explicitly overrule Hill.” 

“For now, we leave lower courts to sort out what, if anything, is left of Hill’s reasoning, all while constitutional rights hang in the balance,” Thomas wrote. 

He argued that the Supreme Court mistakenly treated the Hill case differently from other First Amendment cases because of its abortion context, stating, "Hill's abortion exceptionalism turned the First Amendment upside down.” 

The Hill case “has been seriously undermined, if not completely eroded, and our refusal to provide clarity is an abdication of our judicial duty. This case would have allowed us to provide needed clarity to lower courts.” 

Thomas argued the case contained "numerous" errors and contradicted over fifty years of established First Amendment principles, stating, "This Court had never—and since Hill, has never—taken such a narrow view of content-based speech restrictions.” He also claimed that the Supreme Court's First Amendment jurisprudence was manipulated to specifically disadvantage anti-abortion activists and their right to persuade women that abortion is wrong. 

Advertisement

In 2000, the highest court upheld a Colorado law in a 6-3 decision that prohibited individuals from approaching abortion clinics within eight feet of another person and within 100 feet of a healthcare facility entrance without consent. This law applied to things such as handing out fliers, displaying signs, or engaging in protests. 

Thomas called the decision “absurd,” “defunct,” “erroneous,” and “long-discredited.” 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement