The Stakes in Wisconsin's Supreme Court Race Are High. Here's Why.
Anti-Gunner Organization Just Made the Case for Trans-Identified People to Own Firearms
Here's What's at Stake for Republicans in Wisconsin's Supreme Court Elections
Iran Loads Up Missiles After Trump Issues Threat
Pam Bondi Dismisses Biden-Era 'Jim Crow 2.0' Lawsuit
Colorado Far From Finished Infringing on Gun Rights
How the Left Downplays Politically-Motivated Crime As Just Protests
More 'Extremely Dangerous Criminals' Have Been Sent to El Salvador
Dems Say Wisconsin Is Not for Sale. Walker Hits Them With the Facts.
The High Cost of Coastal Litigation: A Threat to Louisiana’s Economy and Trump’s...
DOGE Will Look Into Lawmakers Who Became 'Strangely Wealthy'
Another Poll Shows Democrats in Disarray Over How the Party Is Handling Trump
Trump's Answer to a Question About a Third-Term Is Sure to Trigger the...
Here’s Why the LA Times Is Suing Mayor Karen Bass
Scott Jennings Goes Up Against Former Pentagon Spokesperson on 'Signalgate'
Tipsheet

Democrats Ramp Up Their Criticism of Tulsi Gabbard

AP Photo/Alex Brandon

Now that former congressman Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) is no longer a threat to Democrats, they are on to the next one in President-elect Donald Trump’s cabinet. 

Advertisement

On Sunday, Democrat Sen. Tammy Duckworth (D-IL) warned viewers on CNN that former Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-HI) is “compromised” and is like a “Russian asset.” 

Host Dana Bash asked Duckworth, who served with Gabbard in the House, what she thought of the former Democrat, accusing her of promoting Russian propaganda. 

“Well, I think she’s compromised,” Duckworth began. “I think by going to Syria and basically um, backing you know, a brutal dictator there. I mean Russian controlled media called her a Russian asset. So I do think that we have a real deep concern whether or not she’s a compromised person.”

She claimed that the U.S. Intelligence community has identified Gabbard of having “troubling relationships with America’s foes,” accusing her of not being able to pass a background check.  

Duckworth said that it would be concerning if Gabbard secures enough GOP votes to get confirmed, claiming she is “very unqualified” and does not have America’s best interests at heart. 

“She has no intelligence background whatsoever,” the Democrat argued. “When she was inIraq she was a medical records clerk A-4 below the rank of sergeant. Her second deployment was actually to Kuwaiti naval base, where she only spent three months training the Kuwaiti military. I don’t know of any intelligence work that she has done. So she is in terms of the intelligence community, very unqualified.”

Advertisement

Gabbard, who confirmed last month that she is joining the Republican party, has an extensive military background. She was in the Army National Guard for more than two decades and was deployed to Iraq and Kuwait. In 2005, she received a Combat Medical Badge for “participation in combat operations under enemy hostile fire in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom III.” Thus, she has more qualifications to serve as Trump’s director of national intelligence than Vice President Kamala Harris ever had to run for president. 

However, Republicans were quick to defend Gabbard and dismissed bogus claims echoed by the Democratic Party. 

Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-Okla.) called Duckworth’s comments the most “ridiculous and outright dangerous” thing to say. 

“That’s the most dangerous thing she could say — is that a United States lieutenant colonel in the United States Army is compromised and is an asset of Russia,” he said. 

Other Democrats, including Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA), accused Gabbard of being in “Putin’s pocket” and having “very questionable judgment.” 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement