Post-Assad Syrian Christians Rise Up to Celebrate Christmas
The Details Are in on How the Feds Are Blowing Your Tax Dollars
Here's the Final Tally on How Much Money Trump Raised for Hurricane Victims
Here's the Latest on That University of Oregon Employee Who Said Trump Supporters...
Watch an Eagles Fan 'Crash' a New York Giants Fan's Event...and the Reaction...
A Second US Navy Fighter Almost Got Shot Out of the Sky
Not Quite As Crusty As Biden Yet
Poll Shows Americans Are Hopeful For 2025, and the Reason Why Might Make...
Legal Group Puts Sanctuary Jurisdictions on Notice Ahead of Trump's Mass Deportation Opera...
Here's Why Texas AG Ken Paxton Sued the NCAA
Of Course NYT Mocks the Virgin Mary
What Is With Jill Biden's White House Christmas Decorations?
Jesus Fulfilled Amazing Prophecies
Meet the Worst of the Worst Biden Just Spared From Execution
Celebrating the Miracle of Light
Tipsheet

NYT Finally Admits Masks Did Nothing

AP Photo/Rogelio V. Solis

Nearly three years since the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic and woke liberals pushing the need for a mask down people's throats, Left-wing New York Times finally admits that wearing a face covering did nothing. 

Advertisement

The article "The Mask Mandates Did Nothing. Will Any Lessons Be Learned?" by columnist Bret Stephens dives into studies conducted on the efficacy of masks. 

After examining the studies closely, Stephens admitted that no hard evidence proves face coverings help decrease the spread of the virus. 

"The most rigorous and comprehensive analysis of scientific studies conducted on the efficacy of masks for reducing the spread of respiratory illnesses — including Covid-19 — was published late last month. Its conclusions, said Tom Jefferson, the Oxford epidemiologist who is its lead author, were unambiguous," Stephens wrote. 

Jefferson, interviewed by journalist Maryanne Demasi, said that masks, not even the infamous N-95 masks, make no difference. 

But what about all those "studies" done claiming that wearing a mask will "save lives," giving politicians the power to mandate one to be in public? 

"They were convinced by non-randomized studies, flawed observational studies," Jefferson replied. 

He continued to say that using masks combined with other preventive measures, such as hand hygiene, physical distancing, and air filtration, still makes no difference in how Covid spreads. 

Advertisement

"Mask mandates were a fool's errand from the start," Stephens wrote, adding, "they may have created a false sense of safety — and thus permission to resume semi-normal life. They did almost nothing to advance safety itself. The Cochrane report ought to be the final nail in this particular coffin."

However, the op-ed sparked controversy among political commentators, arguing that masks didn't do anything for the people's well-being. 

"While it's nice to see the NY Times finally admit masks are worthless, it's false to say the mandates 'did nothing,'" Babylon Bee CEO Seth Dillon wrote, adding "they harmed kids, eroded public trust, and psychologically damaged millions of people to the point where they're still afraid to breathe in public."

Advertisement

Podcast host Kyle Becker criticized those who condemned him for saying the same thing Stephens wrote in his op-ed. 

"Natural immunity is as good as vaccinated immunity. Now, masks are 'worthless.' I'm old enough to remember when I was smeared as spreading 'misinformation' for saying the same things years ago," Becker tweeted. 


Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement