The Globalist Authoritarians Are Playing With Fire
The Only Thing Democrats Won’t Stand Up for Is America
The Press Says Not All Billionaires Are Spending Equal, and Larry O'Donnell Negotiates...
Who's Defying Court Orders Again?
New Bill From Chip Roy to Protect Exotic Hunting Ranches Could Bolster Conservation
Injustice in Nashville
Fighting Against the Tide Of History
The Party of Hate
Time to Lower the Boom on Harvard
In Germany, the Government Wants to Decide What Is True
After Many Warnings, Trump Admin. Freezes Funding for Maine Over Refusal to Comply...
More Bad News Could Be Coming for Planned Parenthood
USCIS Stops Biden Gender Policy ‘Effective Immediately’
Details on Biden's Endorsement of Harris Shows How Much Dems Were in Disarray...
Does This New Poll Show Hopeful News for Israel?
Tipsheet

House Votes to Hold Steve Bannon in Contempt

AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File

The U.S. House of Representatives on Thursday night voted to hold Steve Bannon in contempt of Congress for refusing to comply with a subpoena from the January 6 select committee, in a vote of 229 to 202, with nine Republicans voting with all of the Democrats.

Advertisement

Bannon was among the first figures subpoenaed by the select committee last month. The former White House chief strategist indicated through his attorney that he would defy the subpoena because former President Donald Trump had exerted executive privilege. The former president had advised Bannon, and others subpoenaed, not to comply. 

In a congressional hearing on Thursday, Attorney General Merrick Garland, before the vote to hold Bannon in contempt, sort of addressed how the Department of Justice (DOJ) would handle it.

According to reporting from Katie Benner for The New York Times:

The next step in the conflict is for the U.S. attorney in Washington to decide whether to enforce the subpoena.

Mr. Garland declined to say whether the Justice Department would enforce the subpoena against Mr. Bannon or to give his view on how and when the department enforces congressional subpoenas.

“The Department of Justice will do what it always does in such circumstances,” Mr. Garland said. “We’ll apply the facts and the law and make a decision, consistent with the principles of prosecution.”

Advertisement

As Spencer reported, the attorney general answered "I don't think so" when asked by Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX) if any of the defendants arrested over the events on January 6 were charged with insurrection.

The vote may have been bipartisan but was also marred by partisan bickering. Luke Broadwater highlighted remarks from Reps. Jim Jordan (R-OH) and Jim McGovern (R-MA), as well as a war of words between Reps. Liz Cheney (R-WY) and Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA). 

While his own attorney general may acknowledge that defendants have not been charged with insurrection, President Joe Biden did certainly use the term while speaking earlier on Thursday at the the 10th Anniversary Celebration of the Dedication of the Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., Memorial. 

Biden spoke of a "line of subjugation" and made reference to it with the events on January 6, saying that "that line continues to be the torches emerging from dark shadows in Charlottesville, carrying out Nazi banners and chanting anti-Semitic bile, and Ku Klux Klan flags; and the violent, deadly insurrection on the Capitol nine months ago — it was about white supremacy, in my view."

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement