Not that there's anything wrong with that (via Buzzfeed):
Too much information, Joe -- although I am curious who the "lucky" three were. The man is a walking punch line, but Allahpundit examines the substance of the anecdote he's sharing here. It's totally absurd in its own right:
He really, truly wants you to believe that a guy who waited until an election year to unilaterally enact parts of the DREAM Act and reveal his true position on gay marriage is too high-minded to make policy with an eye to political considerations. Pro tip for Slow Joe: The reason he never asks “how do I benefit from this decision?” at cabinet meetings is because he’s already thought that through. He doesn’t need any input on it from you and Hillary. That’s what Axelrod and Plouffe are for ... Defend his policies if you want, but cut the “above politics” crap at least. We’re one too many “Romney gave a steelworker’s wife cancer” ads past that for it to work anymore.
I'd also add the revelation that the White House pressured Solyndra to delay its bankruptcy notice until after the 2010 elections as yet another example of Obama's overwhelmingly political mindset. I mean, what does Biden think the voter ID lawsuits and Fast & Furious executive privilege moves were all about?