The Reactions to Kamala's Interview Have Been Brutal
Proof Is Seen That CNN Pundits Do Not Watch CNN, and the Lie...
An International Incident Develops As Emmanuel Macron Feuds With Italy Over…Netflix???
It's Not Your Father's Pot Anymore
One's Presence Near a Crime Doesn't Make Them an Expert on Gun Policy
Georgia Judge Rules New Election Rules Are 'Illegal, Unconstitutional, and Void'
How Nebraska's New Law Could Benefit Democrats In the Election
Trump to Troll Kamala By Working at McDonalds
Kamala's Campaign Is Over After Fox News Interview
CNN May Have Confirmed Reports of Harris' Plagiarism, but Did You See How...
Look Who Finally Agreed to Campaign for Kamala
Fani Willis Begs Appeals Court to Reinstate Charges Against Trump
Elder Abuse: They're Still Trotting Out Biden to Campaign for Kamala
Apartments in Another City Are Being Taken Over by Tren de Aragua
The CBS News Scandals Keep Getting Worse
Tipsheet

Federal Judge: Remove Cross Erected in 1954 Honoring Veterans

The American Civil Liberties Union and the Jewish War Veterans of the United States of America took issue with a cross erected on a San Diego mountain in 1954 honoring veterans of the Korean War. After decades of battling the separation of church and state in court, the memorial's Christian defenders are not ready to give up and will try taking the case to the Supreme Court.

Advertisement

CNN reports:

The cross was erected in 1954 in honor of Korean War veterans and has been the subject of near constant judicial back and forth since 1989, when two Vietnam War veterans filed suit saying it violated the California Constitution's "No Preference" clause.

Since the first lawsuit in 1989, the city of San Diego twice tried selling the property beneath the cross to the Mount Soledad Memorial Association, only to be stopped by the courts.

In 2004, the parties involved reached an agreement that would have moved the cross to a nearby church, but two congressmen intervened and inserted a rider into the 2005 omnibus budget bill that designated the property a national veterans memorial and authorized the federal government to accept the donation of the property.

This led to more fights and more court filings.

In 2006, three congressmen pushed through a bill calling for the government to seize the property by eminent domain -- calling it "a historically significant war memorial." The federal government took possession in August of that year.

A lawsuit was filed challenging that transfer almost immediately and that has led to Thursday's ruling.

Advertisement

Advocates of Christian public displays have a tougher battle in the San Diego case as a result of the aforementioned no preference clause. That clause, part of the California state constitution (Art. 1, Sec. 4), reads:

Free exercise and enjoyment of religion without discrimination or preference are guaranteed.

If the case is not taken up by the Supreme Court, the issue will likely be taken to Congress. Although secularists have won this battle, the war is far from over.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement