We Have a New Trump Travel Ban Coming
CNN Commentator: I've Never Seen So Much Anger Directed at Chuck Schumer
So, That's How the Biden White House Participated in the DOJ's Witch Hunt...
Are the Democrats Destroying Themselves?
And Justice for All
Trump Knows How to Deal With Putin and Leftists Do Not
ICE Arrests Another Student for Participating In Columbia Protests
Here's How Big Tech Companies Could Be Held Accountable for Enabling Child Exploitation
Dems Boo Ernst's Speech Touting DOGE Savings
NY Dems Sure Are in Disarray Over Chuck Schumer
Judicial Overreach and the Separation of Powers: Why Judges Cannot Run the Executive...
Who (If Anyone) Will Win the Fusion Race?
The Department of Education Has Finally Flunked Out
The New Property Tax Revolt Is About Freedom
Tipsheet

We Have an Update on Joe Biden's Autopen Use. It's Not Good.

Mandel Ngan/Pool via AP

It’s not a new controversy because Barack Obama used it, but he was mentally fit to be president; Joe Biden was not. There are still some questions regarding its constitutionality, but the use of the autopen under Joe Biden has come under new scrutiny. The reason is simple and unsurprising: a top aide might have abused it (via NY Post):

Advertisement


A key aide to former President Joe Biden may have exceeded their authority by liberally using an autopen to sign official documents, according to two former White House sources, as President Trump’s aides set up “far more restrictive” rules governing the use of the mechanical device. 

A document obtained by The Post outlines the narrow set of circumstances in which Trump’s signature can be affixed to documents, following controversy this week kicked off by a Heritage Foundation analysis of Biden signatures on various records, including last-minute pardons. 

A small group of officials under both Biden and Trump have been delegated the power to get documents “signed” robotically, but 82-year-old Biden’s perceived cognitive decline sparked debate about whether some aides may have assumed his wishes in his final stretch as commander-in-chief. 

One Biden White House source told The Post they suspect that a key aide to the then-president may have made unilateral determinations on what to auto-sign. The Post is not publishing that staffer’s name due to the lack of concrete evidence and refutations by other colleagues. 

The Biden aide, who did not respond to requests for comment, would frequently make mention of what “the boss” wanted, the source said, but compatriots would have “no idea” if it was true because the internal culture was to not ask questions. 

[…] 

“Everyone” was suspicious of this individual exceeding their authority when claiming to speak for the president, the source said. “But no one would actually say it.” 

“I think [the aide] was using the autopen as standard and past protocol,” The Post’s informant said. 

“There is no clarity on who actually approved what — POTUS or [the aide].”

A second Biden White House source agreed that the person was suspected of assuming the then-president’s positions and handing down orders without it being clear if they actually had communicated with the commander-in-chief. 

Advertisement

It brings us back to our favorite question regarding the Biden White House: who was in charge? After the June debate, where Biden imploded on CNN before a national audience, which killed his re-election operation, Hunter Biden was supposedly running the White House and sitting in on sensitive meetings without a security clearance. Now, we have an alleged rogue aide used the autopen with murky approval from the president. 

Talk about king chaos, folks. Let’s wait and see only because anonymous sources aren’t what they used to be. We can thank an overzealous and incompetent anti-Trump clown in the media discrediting this form of confirmation.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement