Here's the Final Tally on How Much Money Trump Raised for Hurricane Victims
WATCH: California's Harsher Criminal Penalties Are Working
Here's the Latest on That University of Oregon Employee Who Said Trump Supporters...
Watch an Eagles Fan 'Crash' a New York Giants Fan's Event...and the Reaction...
We Almost Had Another Friendly Fire Incident
Not Quite As Crusty As Biden Yet
Legal Group Puts Sanctuary Jurisdictions on Notice Ahead of Trump's Mass Deportation Opera...
The International Criminal Court Pretends to Be About Justice
The Best Christmas Gift of All: Trump Saved The United States of America
Who Can Trust White House Reporters Who Hid Biden's Infirmity?
The Debt This Congress Leaves Behind
How Cops, Politicians and Bureaucrats Tried to Dodge Responsibility in 2024
Meet the Worst of the Worst Biden Just Spared From Execution
Celebrating the Miracle of Light
Chimney Rock Demonstrates Why America Must Stay United
Tipsheet

The Biden Administration Violated the First Amendment With Social Media Censorship, Appeals Court Rules

AP Photo/Evan Vucci

The Biden administration likely violated the First Amendment by pressuring social media platforms to censor posts about elections and the COVID-19 pandemic, a federal appeals court ruled. 

Advertisement

On Friday, the Fifth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans ordered that the White House, the FBI and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention cannot “coerce” social media platforms to remove content they believe is misinformation. Two of the three judges on the panel were nominated by former President George W. Bush and one was nominated by President Donald Trump.

The decision from the panel came after a lower court judge found that the Biden administration illegally coerced big tech companies to censor some of their posts (via NBC News):

The lower-court judge found that U.S. officials illegally coerced Meta Platforms’ Facebook and Alphabet’s YouTube into censoring posts related to Covid and the 2020 election.

The 5th Circuit agreed with the Republican state attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana, who had alleged that numerous federal officials coerced social-media platforms into censoring content in violation of the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment’s free speech protections.

But the court, in an unsigned opinion by three judges appointed by Republican presidents, vacated much of the lower court’s injunction, with the exception of a provision concerning alleged coercion, which it narrowed.

The 5th Circuit said the narrower injunction applied to the White House, the surgeon general, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the FBI, but would no longer apply to other federal officials covered by the lower court order. The agencies are barred from coercing, threatening or pressuring social media companies to remove content.

“Social-media platforms’ content-moderation decisions must be theirs and theirs alone,” the court wrote.

Advertisement

The lower court’s ruling placed restrictions on more agencies, including the State Department, Homeland Security, and Department of Health and Human Services.

Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry called the ruling a “win against censorship, totalitarianism, and Biden.”

Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey called the ruling a “massive win against the Biden administration” for its “blatant censorship.” 

Advertisement

“Our team will continue to construct this wall of separation between tech and state,” Bailey concluded. “Yesterday’s ruling was one more brick laid in that foundation. Your First Amendment rights are not up for debate.”

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement