Why Are Deep Red State Republican Senators So Often Squishes?
Stone Age Ports
Crash Retrievals, Reverse Engineering, and the Cost of Secrecy: The UAP Debate Unfolds.
Democratic Anger About Biden Pardon Is All About Trump
More Biden Abuse of Power
The Press Still Pretends the Justice Department Is Pristine
Drug Price Controls Threaten Cancer Cures
End the Sanctuary-for-Migrants Madness
Republicans Still Don't Get It
The Looming Resistance to Donald Trump’s Immigration Agenda
Jill Biden’s Christmas Circus: A Confusing End to a Crummy Four Years
Chris Wright’s Appointment as Secretary of Energy Exposes Media Ignorance
The Fall of DEI: How President Trump Ushers in a Merit-Based Future
American Patients Were Big Winners on Election Night
Nationwide Injunction against Deep State FinCEN
Tipsheet

Special Counsel David Weiss Sees Right Through Biden's Reasoning for Why He Pardoned Hunter

AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin

In a statement explaining his pardon of Hunter Biden, the president claimed the first son was “selectively and unfairly prosecuted.”  But special counsel David Weiss rejected that notion in filings with the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, where Hunter was found guilty of gun crimes, and the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, where the president’s 54-year-old son pleaded guilty to tax charges. 

Advertisement

“The Executive Branch that charged Defendant is headed by that sitting President – Defendant’s father,” Weiss noted. “The Attorney General heading the DOJ was appointed by and reports to Defendant’s father. And that Attorney General appointed the Special Counsel who made the challenged charging decision in this case – while Defendant’s father was still the sitting President. Defendant’s claim is effectively that his own father targeted him for being his son, a claim that is nonsensical under the facts here.” 

Weiss pointed out that when Hunter Biden made the same claims in appeals, they were roundly rejected.

“In total, eleven (11) different Article III judges appointed by six (6) different presidents, including his father, considered and rejected the defendant’s claims, including his claims for selective and vindictive prosecution,” he said. 

Weiss argued the judge overseeing the tax case against Hunter shouldn’t dismiss the indictment even if he was just given a presidential pardon.  

“The Government does not challenge that the defendant has been the recipient of an act of mercy. But that does not mean the grand jury’s decision to charge him, based on a finding of probable cause, should be wiped away as if it never occurred,” Weiss wrote.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement