Sen. Bernie Moreno Had the Perfect Response to CNN Host's Questions About Trump's...
Pentagon Watchdog Launches 'Signalgate' Investigation Into Pete Hegseth
United Kingdom Weighs Striking Back Against US Tariffs, and It's Asking Businesses for...
A Quick History of American Tariffs: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
'Designed for Battle' Isn't a Valid Argument for Gun Control
Have They Even Read the Second Amendment?
Kamala Harris Did More Than Just Endorse New WI Supreme Court Justice
Trump Weighs In on Proxy Voting Proposal, and It Looks Like There May...
Bernie Sanders Once More Tries, Fails Miserably to Get His Anti-Israel Resolutions Passed
Is AOC Really the Democratic Party's Leader? Here's What These Polls Say.
Senate Votes on Confirming Dr. Oz for Role in Trump Administration
We Will Hold Rogue Judges Accountable, Rep. Gill Says
Will the Liberal Media Cover This Horrific Crime Story?
Surprise: The 'Pro-Palestinian' Mob Has Nothing to Say About Hamas Murdering Palestinians
Pro-Hamas Mob Hits New Low With Latest Attack on Fetterman
Tipsheet
Premium

A Proposal One Church Is Considering Is So Woke Even an Atheist Is Calling It 'Utterly Bonkers'

The progressive left is leaving no stone unturned in its quest to erase female and male distinctions in society.

We've already seen this happen as women are being referred to as "pregnant people" or "people with periods," and similarly, men as "people with penises." On Capitol Hill, the Rules of the 117th Congress included changes to gendered language, striking words like "father," "mother," "son," "daughter," etc. And in academia, places like Stanford (though the university is not alone) developed guides attempting to change "harmful" language in technology at the school, which included a section taking aim at gendered words and expressions. According to the guide, "Guys," for example, should be replaced with "people," "everyone," or "folks." While words like "mailman," "landlord," and "manmade" couldn't stand either. 

Now, in one church, The Lord's Prayer could soon be passé as the push toward gender-neutral language goes beyond the ivory towers, government buildings, and healthcare systems. 

This Spring, the Church of England will launch a commission on whether to stop referring to God as "He" – and according to the Right Rev. Dr. Michael Ipgrave, Bishop of Lichfield and vice-chair of the liturgical commission overseeing the issue, "exploring the use of gendered language in relation to God" has been a topic of discussion for years. 

"After some dialogue between the two commissions in this area, a new joint project on gendered language will begin this spring," he said. "In common with other potential changes to authorized liturgical provision, changing the wording and number of authorized forms of absolution would require a full synodical process for approval."

The plan became known when a written question to the Liturgical Commission emerged. That Liturgical Commission was meeting this week during the General Synod.

The question was from Rev Joanna Stobart, from Bath and Wells, who asked "what steps were being taken to offer congregants alternatives to referring to God with male pronouns and if there was any update 'to develop more inclusive language in our authorised liturgy,'" The Telegraph reports.

Stobart's ask for "inclusive language" was not all, she also asked bishops "to provide more options for those who wish to use authorised liturgy and speak of God in a non-gendered way, particularly in authorised absolutions where many of the prayers offered for use refer to God using male pronouns." (The Post Millennial)

Critics who note that gender-neutral language would abandon church teaching are up in arms over the debate. 

"The fact that God is called 'Father' can't be substituted by 'Mother' without changing meaning, nor can it be gender-neutralized to 'Parent' without loss of meaning," Rev. Dr. Ian Paul told the Telegraph. "Fathers and mothers are not interchangeable but relate to their offspring in different ways."

Even TalkTV's Julia Hartley-Brewer, who called herself a "staunch fundamentalist atheist," called the notion "utterly bonkers." 

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement