Trump to Host Zelenskyy at the White House After Breakthrough Mineral Agreement
We Want a Seat at the Table
Scott Jennings Had the Perfect Line for This Ex-Dem Spokesperson
'They Crossed the Line': Tom Homan Issues Threat to Activists Who Doxed ICE...
Conservative Student Group Threatens Legal Action Against School Newspaper Over Vandalism...
There's a Reason Why Progressives Fear Black People With Guns
Supreme Court Overturns Death Row Inmate Richard Glossip's Sentence and Conviction
Rewriting History in Real Time
Guests During the First White House Tour of the New Administration Get a...
Harmeet Dhillon Vows to Enforce the Law Against Racist DEI Practices
Pam Bondi Drops the Hammer on States Defying Trump's Trans Athlete Executive Order
Is Jake Tapper for Real With His Upcoming Book on Biden?
Arrest the Anti-ICE Activists Interfering in Federal Operations
Only the CDU Can Save Germany
Here's Who Is in Charge of DOGE
Tipsheet

Stanford Locks Its 'Harmful Language' Website

Back in May, Stanford University published its “harmful language initiative” that seeks to remove words and phrases it deems offensive from use at the school, but it only began making the rounds on social media this week. The project was an 18-month long endeavor with “stakeholder groups” and sought to address “harmful language in IT at Stanford.” It looked at language that was ableist, ageist, imprecise from a gender standpoint, culturally appropriative, racist, violent, and more, and even put forth suggested alternatives.

Advertisement

The findings are rather incredible.

Call yourself an “American”? Please don’t. Better to say “U.S. citizen,” per the bias hunters, lest you slight the rest of the Americas. “Immigrant” is also out, with “person who has immigrated” as the approved alternative. It’s the iron law of academic writing: Why use one word when four will do?

You can’t “master” your subject at Stanford any longer; in case you hadn’t heard, the school instructs that “historically, masters enslaved people.” And don’t dare design a “blind study,” which “unintentionally perpetuates that disability is somehow abnormal or negative, furthering an ableist culture.” Blind studies are good and useful, but never mind; “masked study” is to be preferred. Follow the science.

“Gangbusters” is banned because the index says it “invokes the notion of police action against ‘gangs’ in a positive light, which may have racial undertones.” Not to beat a dead horse (a phrase that the index says “normalizes violence against animals”), but you used to have to get a graduate degree in the humanities to write something that stupid.  (WSJ)

Advertisement


Why they wouldn’t be proud to stand by this index is anyone’s guess, but following backlash, the website is now restricted to the Stanford community.  

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement