The Law Firm That Laundered the Russia Hoax Has Been Stripped of Security...
Trump Gives New Instructions to DOGE
Bill Nye Spews Pure Science Fictions About the South Carolina Wildfires
Do We Have an Amy Coney Barrett Problem?
Justice Department Launches Investigation Into University of California Over Antisemitism...
Seriously, the Fact-Checkers Should Just Take the Rest of the Month Off...
Scott Jennings Once More Issues a Key Reminder About 80/20 Issue of Trans...
Office of Civil Rights Goes After Maine for Ignoring Trump’s Order on Women’s...
State Department to Revoke Visas of Pro-Hamas Agitators Here on Student Visas
Trump Has Some Thoughts About Cruel Remarks From Rachel Maddow, Nicolle Wallace on...
Billions Given to Months-Old Charities by $375B EPA Slush Fund
Jasmine Crockett Outdoes Herself Yet Again, Claims Trump Wants to Send Black People...
Democrats Sure Are in Disarray Over the Theatrics From Tuesday Night
Study Reveals This Disturbing Truth About Sex Reassignment Surgery
As Speaker Johnson, Other Republicans React to Dems' Chaos Over Censuring Al Green,...
Tipsheet
Premium

Timing of Edit to WHO Page on Vaccinating Children Raises Questions About Big Tech Influence

AP Photo/Ted S. Warren

For as many faults as the World Health Organization (WHO) has, it ought to be commended for taking a different approach to children amid the coronavirus pandemic than the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Particularly, it never advised children two and up to be masked as the CDC did. Given the "psychosocial and developmental milestones" in young children, the WHO recommended kids five and under don't wear them and those between 6-11 to only use them under certain conditions. 

Similarly, until very recently, the WHO also advised against vaccinating children "for the moment."

Behold, its very reasonable position: "There is not yet enough evidence on the use of vaccines against COVID-19 in children to make recommendations for children to be vaccinated against COVID-19. Children and adolescents tend to have milder disease compared to adults."

Then something strange happened. Its tune changed a bit, which happened to coincide with Big Tech not liking this recommendation very much. 

Gone is the big headline that read, "Children should not be vaccinated for the moment." In its place is this: 

Children and adolescents tend to have milder disease compared to adults, so unless they are part of a group at higher risk of severe COVID-19, it is less urgent to vaccinate them than older people, those with chronic health conditions and health workers.   

More evidence is needed on the use of the different COVID-19 vaccines in children to be able to make general recommendations on vaccinating children against COVID-19.

WHO's Strategic Advisory Group of Experts (SAGE) has concluded that the Pfizer/BionTech vaccine is suitable for use by people aged 12 years and above. Children aged between 12 and 15 who are at high risk may be offered this vaccine alongside other priority groups for vaccination.

Vaccine trials for children are ongoing and WHO will update its recommendations when the evidence or epidemiological situation warrants a change in policy. (WHO)

The Science is just rapidly evolving, I'm sure. Meanwhile, the CDC is having its emergency meeting this week to discuss the COVID-19 vaccines in adolescents, particularly discussing reports of myocarditis after receiving the mRNA vaccines. 

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement