MSNBC Legal Analyst Blows Apart Narrative That Trump Is 'Losing' Legal Battles
Ilhan Omar Reveals What's Causing the Death of Debate in America. It's Laughably...
Black Radio Host Warns Dems Will Never Win Again If They Don't Abandon...
The Associated Press' Headline Over the Murder of the Israeli Hostages Is Beyond...
CPAC 2025 was All About The Love
Democrats Pick Some Real Winners To Be Their Leadership
DOGE Won’t Be Enough Rein in Government Spending
End Homelessness By Making It Illegal
This is the Left
Same Ol' Situation, Same Ol' Democrat Party
No Such Thing as Palestine
Democratic Party is in the Intensive Care Unit
New 'DEI Exposed' Book Reveals the Depths it Has Permeated Academia
An Embarrassment to No One
America’s Venezuela Policy Should Serve American Interests
Tipsheet

ACB Quickly Corrects Klobuchar's False Statement About Recusal From Any 2020 Election Case

AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster, Pool

Judge Amy Coney Barrett fired back at Sen. Amy Klobuchar on Wednesday on the issue of whether, if confirmed, she would recuse herself from a case pertaining to the 2020 election, should one arise. 

Advertisement

The topic came up as the senator pressed the judge about the fact that she briefly worked on the Bush v. Gore case as did Justices Gorsuch and Kavanaugh.

"Having justices with this background…decide any cases related to the upcoming election, do you think that will undermine the legitimacy of the court?” Klobuchar asked.

Barrett refused to take the bait, responding that she appeared to be “trying to elicit a question about whether it would be appropriate for justices who participated in that litigation to sit on the case rather than recuse, and I went down that road yesterday saying it’s a legal question.”

“I know, you said you wouldn’t recuse,” Klobuchar jumped in.

Barrett interjected, “That isn’t what I said. I said I wouldn’t commit, I wouldn’t pre-commit.”

Advertisement

On Tuesday, the judge responded to questioning about recusal from Sen. Patrick Leahy.

"I commit to you to fully and faithfully apply the law of recusal and part of that law is to consider any 'appearances' questions" — as in, even whether it might look to outsiders as though the judge couldn't be fair, Barrett said. "I can't offer a legal conclusion right now about the outcome of the decision I would reach."

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement