Post-Assad Syrian Christians Rise Up to Celebrate Christmas
The Details Are in on How the Feds Are Blowing Your Tax Dollars
Here's the Final Tally on How Much Money Trump Raised for Hurricane Victims
Since When Did We Republicans Start Being Against Punishing Criminals?
Poll Shows Americans Are Hopeful For 2025, and the Reason Why Might Make...
Protecting the Lives of Murderers, but Not Babies
Legal Group Puts Sanctuary Jurisdictions on Notice Ahead of Trump's Mass Deportation Opera...
Wishing for Santa-Like Efficiency in the USA
Celebrating the Miracle of Redemption
A Letter to Jesus
Here's Why Texas AG Ken Paxton Sued the NCAA
Of Course NYT Mocks the Virgin Mary
What Is With Jill Biden's White House Christmas Decorations?
Jesus Fulfilled Amazing Prophecies
Meet the Worst of the Worst Biden Just Spared From Execution
Tipsheet
Premium

Netflix's 'Cuties' Did Not Sit Well with a Texas Grand Jury

AP Photo/Marcio Jose Sanchez, File

Netflix’s recent film "Cuties" featuring adolescent girls in revealing outfits performing sexualized dance moves did not sit well with right-minded individuals. Some, like actress Patricia Heaton, described the movie as a "pedophile’s dream." Indeed, many who did watch the movie said it was worse than the clips and promotional material made it seem (which was already really bad).

Netflix defended the film throughout the saga and said it was meant as a "social commentary against the sexualization of young children," which, for obvious reasons, didn’t pass the smell test because you don’t exploit children in the process of making that point.

Pundits, the political class, and many in between called for investigations and the outright jailing of Netflix executives over the film.

This week, things took a step in the right direction after the streaming giant was indicted by a grand jury in Texas for its promotion of the "lewd exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of a clothed or partially clothed child who was younger than 18 years of age at the time the visual material was created, which appeals to the prurient interest in sex, and has no serious, literary, artistic, political, or scientific value."

Tyler County District Attorney Lucas Babin said after seeing the film, he "knew there was probable cause to believe it was criminal."

"The legislators of this state believe promoting certain lewd material of children has destructive consequences," Babin said. "If such material is distributed on a grand scale, isn’t the need to prosecute more, not less?"

He continued: "A grand jury found probable cause for this felony, and my job is to uphold the laws of this State and see that justice is done."

The Parents Television Council praised the move.

"We applaud the bold action to investigate Netflix for its sexualized depiction of 11-year-old girls in the film 'Cuties.' The admirable intention of the film to raise awareness of the pressure girls have in today’s sexualized culture is entirely obviated by the sexualization and exploitation depicted in the film. 'Cuties' is only the latest example of a host of programs that should be scrutinized because they sexually exploit children. It is time for Netflix to be held to account for enabling these kinds of programs to exist on its platform," PTC President Tim Winter said in a statement.

Netflix pushed back and said the "charge is without merit and we stand by the film."

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement