10 Hard Facts About Ukraine and NATO
We Have Some Details About the Epstein Document Dump That's Coming Tomorrow
The Liberal Meltdown Continues and Is Glorious (but Also Dangerous)
A Warning for President Trump
The Regulatory State Continues to Target Fantasy Sports
The Unmatched Bigotry of Joy Reid
The Top Task for Team Trump
Poor Europe: Denial, Decline, Demise
Trump Needs Congress to Deliver on Lower Pricesinl
Mine, Baby, Mine – Right Here in the USA!
President Trump Wants to Abolish the Department of Education. Sounds Outrageous to Some.
Prosecute Released Palestinians
The ICE-Man Cometh
Mexico’s Bid to Swipe Second Amendment Rights Explained
Moving Fast and Breaking Things Does Not Work in Washington
Tipsheet
Premium

Sigh: Biden Butchers New UK Prime Minister's Name, Of Course

twitter

In fairness, it's getting hard to keep up with the UK's Prime Ministers, as they've had three within the last two months. Nevertheless, if you're going to mention the new guy as part of an ethnic pander, at least spell his name out phonetically so you're in the ballpark on pronunciation. It's "Rush-ee Soo-nack," Mr. President – not, well, whatever this is. 

Nope: 

At least he didn't mumble something about a 7-11. Sunak makes history as the United Kingdom's first Prime Minister of color (Benjamin Disraeli was Jewish, and therefore a minority), but many on the British Left seem preoccupied not with "diversity," "representation" and "inclusion" – their usual hobby horses – in this case. Instead, they're caught up on Sunak's wealth, tossing around "rich" like it's an epithet. Apparently, "his" fortune is actually his wife's and her family's, but that's beside the point, of course. They don't care about racial history-making if the history is being made by a conservative, just as they weren't keen on celebrating any of their country's three female leaders, all of whom have been Tories. From a political and ideological perspective, Sunak inherits a party in total chaos and flagging badly in the polls. He has until early 2025 at the latest to right the ship. It will be interesting to see how he leads, as one of the youngest PMs in British history (at 42), and coming from the less conservative wing of the Conservative Party. 

Meanwhile, back on the home front, let's discuss another apparent Biden glitch. Many conservatives shared this clip over the weekend, goofing on a president who appeared to zone out mid-questioning during an interview with MSNBC. People asked if he'd even nodded off when asked about his 2024 plans and whether the First Lady was on board for a re-election run. In case you missed it, watch:

My take is a little different. I don't think he spaced out or was falling asleep. This is pure conjecture on my part, but my interpretation of this awkward exchange is that 2024 may be a sensitive subject inside the Biden household. My guess is that the interviewer asked this quick follow-up as a friendly suck-up, not realizing it pulled the discussion into a minefield. Biden clearly has his typical pat answer about 2024: He "intends" to run, but he hasn't formally decided yet. I have my doubts, but that's what he consistently says. But when he was asked if his wife is supportive of another campaign, he froze up, trying to figure out how to respond. He finally landed on a formulation that the first lady thinks they're doing "very important" work, but that isn't really an answer at all. If I had to guess, there is internal dissension within the Biden family on this question, and Jill Biden might be privately lobbying against a 2024 run. Again, this is speculation by me, but re-watch the clip above through the lens of my theory and see if it seems plausible. I think it very much is. I'll leave you with a somewhat related little slip by the current president: 


Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement