Post-Assad Syrian Christians Rise Up to Celebrate Christmas
The Details Are in on How the Feds Are Blowing Your Tax Dollars
Here's the Final Tally on How Much Money Trump Raised for Hurricane Victims
Since When Did We Republicans Start Being Against Punishing Criminals?
Poll Shows Americans Are Hopeful For 2025, and the Reason Why Might Make...
Protecting the Lives of Murderers, but Not Babies
Legal Group Puts Sanctuary Jurisdictions on Notice Ahead of Trump's Mass Deportation Opera...
Wishing for Santa-Like Efficiency in the USA
Celebrating the Miracle of Redemption
A Letter to Jesus
Here's Why Texas AG Ken Paxton Sued the NCAA
Of Course NYT Mocks the Virgin Mary
What Is With Jill Biden's White House Christmas Decorations?
Jesus Fulfilled Amazing Prophecies
Meet the Worst of the Worst Biden Just Spared From Execution
Tipsheet

Raskin: 'Thousands of Witnesses' Wouldn't Have Changed the GOP's 'Silly Arguments'

AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

House impeachment lead Congressman Jamie Raskin (D-MD) on Sunday defended his team's initial decision to pursue subpoenaing witnesses. 

Raskin made what appeared to be a last-minute ask to subpoena witnesses, something the Senate agreed to in a 55 to 45 vote. The impeachment lead pointed to breaking news that occurred late Friday night. Attention was called to Rep. Jaime Herrera Beutler's conversation with Kevin McCarthy, where the minority leader allegedly recounted a conversation he had with President Trump. According to Herrera Beutler, McCarthy allegedly told Trump to "call off" the riots at the Capitol. The president allegedly said it wasn't his supporters who caused the chaos and violence at the Capitol. Instead, Trump allegedly placed blame on Antifa, something McCarthy disagreed with. 

Advertisement

Although the ask came as a surprise to Senate Democrats and the White House, Raskin pointed to a resolution dictating the impeachment rules. In the agreement set forth by Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and Mitch McConnell (R-KY), parameters for subpoenaing witnesses would be decided if the Senate voted in favor of the move. It's why Raskin said it was the "moment to do it." After an hour-long recess, the Senate came back into session and both the prosecution and the defense agreed to forgo witnesses. Instead, Rep. Herrera Beutler's statement was entered into the record as evidence. 

"We won that vote, we were going to proceed to do it, and the Republicans stimulated to allow the evidence to come into the record," Raskin explained to "Meet the Press" host Chuck Todd.  "... We could have had a thousand witnesses but that could not have overcome the kinds of silly arguments that people like McConnell and Caputo were hanging their hats on. They're trying to have it both ways."

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement