A Pro-Hamas Clown Vandalized a Restaurant Over Its Israeli Flags. There Was Just...
A Most Memorable Hockey Tribute Happened in Columbus Last Night
An International Incident Develops As Emmanuel Macron Feuds With Italy Over…Netflix???
One's Presence Near a Crime Doesn't Make Them an Expert on Gun Policy
Where Were These 230 Doctors Wanting Medical Records Four Years Ago?
Anti-Gun Organization Shocked to Learn Criminals Break Laws
Kamala Offers Black Men Bribe to Get Their Votes
Trump Vows to 'End All Sanctuary Cities Immediately'
Fani Willis Begs Appeals Court to Reinstate Charges Against Trump
Elder Abuse: They're Still Trotting Out Biden to Campaign for Kamala
Apartments in Another City Are Being Taken Over by Tren de Aragua
The CBS News Scandals Keep Getting Worse
A Reality TV Star Admitted That He Pretended to Be Transgender. Here's Why.
The FBI's Violent Crime Stats Suddenly Look a Lot Different
Dems in Disarray: AOC and Fetterman Fighting Online Over Israel
Tipsheet

DOJ Refuses To Hold Barr, Ross In Contempt. Here's Why.

AP Photo/Andrew Harnik

The Department of Justice on Wednesday informed Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) they would not hold Attorney General William Barr and Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross in contempt of Congress for failing to produce documents related to Congressional subpoenas.

Advertisement

According to Deputy Attorney General Jeffrey Rosen, the author of Wednesday's letter, said federal courts realized the sensitivity of documents relating to the Trump administration's decision to ask a citizenship question on the 2020 Census. The documents were privileged, meaning they couldn't be used in civil litigation. 

Despite that, the Oversight Committee received roughly 30,000 pages of documents relating to the policy decision.

"The Department of Justice's long-standing position is that we will not prosecute an official for contempt of Congress for declining to provide information subject to a presidential assertion of executive privilege," Rosen wrote. "Across administrations of both parties, we have consistently adhered to the position that 'the contempt of Congress statute was not intended to apply and could not constitutionally be applied to an Executive Branch official who asserts the President's claim of executive privilege.'"

Advertisement

Rosen cites multiple other instances where Department of Justice officials were not held in contempt for failing to respond to Congressional subpoenas. The most recent example was when the Republican-controlled House attempted to hold then-Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt for failing to to comply with Congressional subpoenas related to Fast and Furious, the gunrunning case that left Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry dead.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement