An Infamous COVID Doctor Is Now Fearmongering About Bird Flu
Trump Doubles Down on Supporting Johnson
The Libs are Noticing Biden’s Broadband Scandal
Scott Jennings Drops Truth Bomb About the Real Jimmy Carter
Chinese Government Claims it Didn't Hack US Treasury Department, but There's a Problem
Thomas Massie Blasts Mike Johnson, Says He's 'The Next Paul Ryan'
Trump Gives Smart Directive to Nominees Ahead of Senate Hearings
Russia's Foreign Minister Tells the World How He Feels About Trump's Peace Proposal
Trump Had a Meeting With Bowser. Here's How the DC Mayor Described It.
You Won't Believe How Washington Monthly Compared Carter and Reagan
The Hollywood Reporter Tears George Clooney Apart for Role in Forcing Biden Out...
Clip Resurfaces of Squad Members Clapping Along As Al Jazeera Journalist Downplays Hamas
Poll Shows How Americans Feel About Celebrities Weighing in on Politics. Will They...
9/11 Plea Deal Reinstated
What the New Year Could Have in Store for You
OPINION

Washington's Christmas Eve Crossing: A Masterstroke in Strategic Withdrawal

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Image courtesy of Nexus Media, from the film Washington's Cross

General George Washington, faced with overwhelming British forces during the Revolutionary War, demonstrated that sometimes retreat is the foundation of ultimate triumph. In the fall of 1776, Washington's Continental Army, which numbered about 20,000 troops, was stationed at Brooklyn Heights. With superior numbers and firepower, the British would overwhelm Washington and force him to execute a strategic withdrawal. 

Advertisement

After 100 miles of blizzard conditions, there were a divided 5,000 soldiers, ragged and ill-equipped, without funds or governmental support. Washington's retreat was no small feat. It involved crossing the East River and the Hudson River into New Jersey, abandoning Fort Washington in New York City to British control, and eventually crossing the Delaware River into Pennsylvania. 

However, it was not a mark of failure but a decision that preserved the Continental Army.

Retreat is misunderstood. Popular culture and misguided narratives often portray it as cowardice or defeat, but Washington's actions highlight its strategic value and necessity. The General preserved his army's strength by refusing to engage in battles he couldn't win. The British, overextended and burdened with supply challenges, grew complacent.

Washington understood that wars are not won in a single battle but through perseverance and adaptability. His retreat allowed him to regroup and plan a surprise attack on the Hessians at Trenton to restore and refuel his army. The victory also provided a tactical advantage and a much-needed morale boost for his troops and the fledgling nation.

The surprise victory at Trenton, without losses, was followed by another at the Princeton Battlefield that would recall Cornwallis, and demonstrate that Washington's retreat was not the end but the beginning of a counteroffensive that would turn the tide of the war. These successes shattered the myth of British invincibility and galvanized support for the Revolution.

Advertisement

Washington's strategy revealed his genius—not as a commander of overwhelming forces but as a master of resilience and timing. By retreating, Washington not only saved his army but also preserved the hope of independence. His ability to navigate the darkest moments of the war laid the groundwork for the eventual victory at Yorktown and the birth of the United States.

The lessons of Washington's retreat resonate today, particularly in conflicts like Ukraine's war with Russia. War is not a linear path to victory; it demands adaptation, endurance, and the willingness to retreat when necessary to build strength. With a larger and more resourceful adversary, Ukraine has had to endure setbacks, regroup, and rely on strategic alliances for survival.

But Washington's lesson goes deeper.

Victory requires not just tactical acumen but a broader vision of national resilience. It meant rallying the scattered colonies around a shared cause in Washington's time, not solely relying on foreign powers. For Ukraine, it means strengthening its society, economy, and alliances to outlast aggression. For global powers, it’s a reminder that true strength lies not in endless offensives but in the ability to rebuild, resupply, and outthink one's adversaries.

Washington's approach to war aligns with the principle of "peace through strength." This philosophy, born in Roman times and later echoed by leaders like Teddy Roosevelt and Ronald Reagan, emphasizes that strength is not just about military might but resilience, strategy, and the will to persevere. Reagan, in dealing with the Soviet Union, understood that an arms race was not about warfighting but about ensuring that the costs of conflict were too high for the enemy to bear.

Advertisement

In the same way, the United States today must focus on rebuilding its strength—not for the sake of neo-conservative adventurism or entangled global interests, but for genuine national security. A strong economy, robust infrastructure, and a unified society are as critical as military power. Washington's retreat and subsequent victories show that strength is not the absence of setbacks but the ability to rise stronger after them and restore American initiative.

The ultimate lesson is this: Retreat is not shameful when it is strategic. It can be the foundation for enduring peace and ultimate victory. Washington proved this in the Revolutionary War, which remains a lesson for leaders today. Whether facing icy conditions at home or abroad, the path to lasting strength begins with the wisdom to endure, adapt, and fight another day.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos