How the FBI Responded to Elon Musk's Email Isn't Shocking. The Lib Media...
Elon Musk's Latest Directive for Federal Workers Is Straight Out of Office Space
Possibly The Dumbest Example Of Waste DOGE Has Discovered (So Far)
Maine Governor Janet Mills: Leader Of The New Confederate States of America
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 256: What the New Testament Says About Pride...
JD Vance Dominates CPAC Straw Poll as Leading Contender for 2028 GOP Nomination
Tony Evers Aims to Change 'Mother' to 'Inseminated Person'
Israel Does Not Have the Kishkes* to Win
USAID is Funding Political Persecution in Ukraine
Congress Must Cancel Foreign Derived Intangible Income Tax Break
Trump Taps Kash Patel as the New Acting Director of the ATF
Trump Reveals the One Thing That Made Him Run Again
New SBA Chief Goes Viral After Touring Empty Offices and Bringing Staff Back...
Trump Ends Deportation Protections for 500,000 Haitian Nationals
Pope Francis in Critical Condition After Being Diagnosed With Pneumonia
OPINION

Will Congress Take Internet Safety Seriously?

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
AP Photo/Gemunu Amarasinghe

Having grown up in a Washington, DC, suburb, I have seen many political protests, witnessed firsthand the battles between political parties, and have found myself stuck in traffic when the U.S. president’s motorcade drives through town. 

Advertisement

It’s no joke that gridlock exists in our nation’s capital on many levels.

But I found a new optimism when I saw both Democrats and Republicans unite in their support of crucial online child protection bills over the last year, and during the January 31 Senate hearing when they grilled five tech CEOs from Meta (parent company of Facebook and Instagram), X (formerly Twitter), Discord, TikTok, and Snap over how their products and platforms are harming children.

Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) told the five CEOs, “Collectively, your platforms really suck at policing themselves." Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) said to Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, “You have blood on your hands.”

Online child safety is a unifying issue because the problems affect everyone, no matter the political party.

Since the January 31 hearing, bills like the Kids Online Safety Act have found major support from both parties in the U.S. Senate, and even from Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer. A companion version was introduced into the U.S. House, and even voted out of a House committee, making the Kids Online Safety Act poised to be the first online child protection bill passed in Congress in decades.

But so far, neither the Senate nor the House have voted on the Kids Online Safety Act, which is designed to hold social media companies and other digital platforms accountable for protecting children online and requires stringent safety and privacy settings to be on by default.

Advertisement

They also have not voted on other crucial child protection bills like the Children and Teens Online Privacy Protection Act 2.0, the EARN IT Act, and the Kids Off Social Media Act.

Our children face an online world that is primarily designed for adults, with little to no protections for them. They are up against powerful algorithms that feed harmful content to them. They can interact with adults who may turn out to be predators and fall victim to sextortion schemes. They can access sexually explicit and graphically violent content with a click of a button.

In a New York Times op-ed, the U.S. Surgeon General Vivek Murthy called for warning labels to be added to social media platforms, saying that the “mental health crisis among young people is an emergency — and social media has emerged as an important contributor.”

“These harms [from social media] are not a failure of willpower and parenting; they are the consequence of unleashing powerful technology without adequate safety measures, transparency or accountability,” he wrote.

It is certainly true that social media isn’t getting any “safer” for children – there are great risks to our youth that come with social media usage.

Murthy’s warning label idea may or may not stop teens from using social media platforms, but it will hopefully raise awareness around the significant threat social media poses to youth mental health, and will encourage more parents to look closely at what their children are doing online. When the Surgeon General’s warning was added to tobacco products in 1965, it did have a real and lasting impact on awareness around the significant health risks associated with smoking and tobacco use.

Advertisement

But even the “warning labels” idea must be taken up by Congress.

Tech platforms aren’t racing to fix these problems, leaving families left to deal with the consequences. Tech lobbying groups rush to oppose these child protection bills and have sued to prevent laws like California’s Age-Appropriate Design Code Act from taking effect.

Our children are being harmed by a tech industry that does not prioritize child safety.

The buck stops with Congress. There is simply no excuse for Congress not to ensure our children are better protected online.

Melissa Henson is the vice president of the Parents Television and Media Council, a nonpartisan education organization advocating responsible entertainment. On X: @ThePTC

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos