It's Official: Peter Navarro Is Back for the Second Trump Term
Here's How Many GOP Senators Are Now Opposed to Pete Hegseth's Defense Secretary...
Was Kamala the First Candidate to Not Flip a Single County Since 1932?
Trump Called Pete Hegseth. Here's What He Told Him.
Esquire Vaporizes Error-Laden Column and Behold the Lack of Outrage for Its Pushing...
Elder Rape Is a Strength!
Everytown For Gun Safety Disgustingly Capitalizes on CEO's Murder, Leaves Out Key Point...
AGs Ask SCOTUS To Toss Mexican Lawsuit
Supreme Court Hears Historic Argument on Transgender Rights
Jerry Nadler Drops Out of High-Stakes House Race After Reports Claim Pelosi Staged...
Mike Johnson Rejects Biden's Plea for Ukraine Funding, and Instead Vows to Follow...
Democratic Stronghold Caves Into Trump's Popularity
Pete Hegseth's Mother Sets the Record Straight After 'Despicable' NYT Published Private Em...
Trump Makes Major Move in Crumbling Fani Willis Case
Trump's Threat to Hamas Represents Blunt, Refreshing Change
OPINION

The Democrat’s Fictitious World

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
AP Photo/Andrew Harnik

President Biden’s State of the Union address triggered predictable reactions among his supporters, who described hisspeech as high energy, forceful” and other adjectives rarely found preceding his name. Naturally, Republicans disagreed. “C’mon, man,” Shmuel Klatzkin quipped: “Was it Adderall, meth, or old-fashioned bennies?” Could’ve been a “miracle, or…better living through chemistry,” but that wasn’t the guy we’ve known since 2020, a man whose mangled syllables tumbled from his lips in batches of incoherence. In other words, the President played a role, a fictionalized version of himself, after which he reverted to form, because he couldn’t keep up the ruse.

Advertisement

In fact, Democratic speeches often reflect an alternate reality, as Dan McLaughlin and others put it, that refers to things that don’t exist, or if they do, are linked to reality by the thinnest threads imaginable. To take an extreme instance from the last century, during the Soviet era, Stalin justified his purgesby blaming Leon Trotsky, whose agents allegedly had penetrated every corner of Soviet society, creating havoc and organizing plots against the General Secretary (Stalin’s title). The only link to reality was Trotsky, who did exist until Stalin’s agents tracked him down and killed him in Mexico. But the rest was sheer fantasy, never happened, purely fictitious. Stalin’s enormous subterfuge solidified his power, which was his primary objective.

Since the Democrats’ moral collapse in the sixties, their lust for unchallenged power has reaped whirlwinds of grotesque fantasies that demonstrate the Party’s descent into a totalitarianmode of thinking and acting. The foundation of every totalitarian movement is fanatical commitment to a fictitiousworld, one best described by Hannah Arendt as comprising“fabricated insanity” buttressed by indoctrination and propaganda. Terror, concentration camps, and oppressionpracticed by twentieth century dictatorships have been replaced in America by wokism, DEI, the cancel culture, critical race theory, and censorship policies that eventually will coverthoughtcrimes as well as speech. All of which are incessant, ubiquitous, and shrill. 

Advertisement

Following the totalitarian script, Democrats have usedpropaganda that smothers harsh realities with blankets of euphemisms. Thus, “pro-choice,” “mostly peaceful protests,” and “gender-affirming surgery” have entered the American lexicon to mask infanticide, murderous riots, and experiences of poor souls who leave hospitals believing their disturbed mental condition was corrected by a surgical fix. All were rationalizations as well, but fictions, nonetheless. And of course, propaganda oozes from schemes to discredit their opponents, such as Russian collusion accusations that plagued Donald Trump and were revealed as fictitious only after they had smeared his reputation. 

Other fictions likely will remain with us for a long time, mostly because the lies and misrepresentations are built into huge organizations with millions of employees who have a stake in their perpetuation. Anthropogenetic climate change is the mother of all fictions, embracing every institution in the United States and Europe, regardless of its advocates’ unbroken recordof failed predictions. Is there actually such a thing as human-caused climate change? Sure, there is, states Stephen Koonin, who served in the Department of Energy in the Obama Administration and authored Unsettled: What Climate Science Tells Us, What It Doesn’t, and Why It Matters. Enough to justify apocalyptic frenzies about destroying civilization in order save it? No, he says, the data don’t support such a policy. Doesn’t matter; nearly unlimited power accrues to those who convince the masses otherwise. After all, the fate of the planet is at stake, right? Therefore, surrender your freedoms and eat bugs.

Advertisement

Koonin was labeled a “climate denier” for his troubles, an unscientific rebuke for challenging a totalitarian narrative. But when Harvard Economics Professor Roland Fryer found "no racial differences in officer-involved shootings,” he stated that “all hell broke loose,” and he needed police protection for a month. The deities of totalitarian narratives are jealous gods, indeed.

Which means that Americans who have families, careers, and reputations to protect  practically all of us  must step carefully through the minefield of “alternate realities” that plague the country and have energized America’s oldest political party for the past two generations. Challenging fictitious accounts about the foundations of our lives is a dangerous, perhaps even a life-threatening undertaking. But it must be done. Indeed, the survival of our Republic depends on it.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos