Wray and Mayorkas Were Set to Testify Today. They Didn't Show Up.
Matt Gaetz Withdraws Attorney General Nomination
Bucks County Dem Apologizes for Trying to Steal the PA Senate Race
Jon Stewart Rips Into Dems for Their Obnoxious Sugar-Coating of the 2024 Election
Trump's Border Czar Issues a Warning to Dem Politicians Pledging to Shelter Illegal...
Homan Says They'll 'Absolutely' Use Land Texas Offered for Deportation Operation
For the First Time in State History, California Voters Say No to Another...
Breaking: ICC Issues Arrest Warrants for Netanyahu, Gallant
Begich Flips Alaska's Lone House Seat for Republicans
It's Hard to Believe the US Needs Legislation This GOP Senator Just Introduced,...
We’ve Got an Update on Jussie Smollett…and You’re Not Going to Like It
Here’s How Many FCC Complaints Were Filed After Kamala Harris’ 'SNL' Appearance
By the Numbers: Trump's Extraordinary Gains Among Latinos, From Texas to...California?
John Oliver Defended Transgender Athletes Competing in Women’s Sports. JK Rowling Responde...
Restoring American Strength and Security with Trump’s Cabinet Picks
OPINION

Grand Words From the Gipper

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
AP Photo/Patrick Semansky

From Ronald Reagan:  

“’We the people’ tell the government what to do, it doesn’t tell us.  ‘We the people’ are the driver, the government is the car.  We decide where it should go, and by what route, and how fast.  Almost all the world’s constitutions are documents in which governments tell the people what their privileges are.  Our Constitution is a document in which ‘We the people’ tell the government what it is allowed to do.  ‘We the people’ are free.”

Advertisement

As always, the Gipper is spot on.  Our Constitution was written to specifically tell the federal government what it could, and could not, do.  The people, and the government, thus knew exactly what the limitations of government are (or were supposed to be).  The government can’t cross those lines, otherwise it infringes on the freedoms of the people and becomes a tyranny.  That is the genius of the American system as established by our Founding Fathers.  It is almost unique in history.

Mr. Reagan is absolutely correct.  Today, and down through history, most governments, if they even had a “written constitution” (and most didn’t), gave the people the rights it (government) wanted them to have.  This isn’t freedom, this is slavery, and that’s exactly what our Founders called it.  If someone (or government) ALLOWS you to do what you do, you aren’t “free,” you are a slave to them.  “Is life so dear, and peace so sweet as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?”  Those are the words of the great Patrick Henry as he argued for secession from the British government’s “chains and slavery.”  People aren’t free if government gives them the rights they have.  Because any rights the government gives, the government can take away.  Isn’t that what slave owners did?

Interesting, in the 18th century, England did not have (and still doesn’t) a “written” constitution like America’s.  This is one of the main reasons our Founders did write a constitution.  Put government’s “rights” (limitations) down on paper so that everyone—the people AND the government—know exactly what they are and when the government is going beyond its defined powers.  Americans KNEW what their freedoms were because they KNEW exactly what government could and could not do.

Advertisement

Very few countries have ever had such a system, which is what made America a unique, and grand, experiment in liberty.  

Please note the word “experiment.”

Unfortunately, the battle in America of “liberty” vs. “tyranny” began almost immediately after our Constitution was ratified.  Alexander Hamilton wanted a national bank, a “Band of the United States,” which Thomas Jefferson argued was unconstitutional.  “Where is a government bank mentioned in the Constitution?” Jefferson asked.  “It’s IMPLIED,” Hamilton answered, “in the ‘necessary and proper’ clause of Article 1 Section 8.”  Patrick Henry was aghast at that argument.  “Given that logic, you could imply anything in the Constitution.  That defeats the wholepurpose of the document” (I’m paraphrasing theirarguments here).  Southerners disputed the Bank, saying it would help Northern industry and hurt Southern agriculture, a point which Hamilton granted because that is exactly what he wanted—an increase in American industry. The national government, Jeffersonians argued, is supposed to be neutral, not aiding one section of society over another.  That would be divisive, not unifying.  (What a novel concept...)  This “bank war”—its constitutionality—was actually the first step in dividing post-Constitutional America between North and South, the first step towards America’s War Between the States.

Advertisement

Much of the first 80 years of American history was a political battle over the constitutionality of federal actions.  “Loose constructionists” (Hamiltonians) wanted the government to promote science, build roads and canals, set aside public lands for conservation—all of which may be good for a country, but none of which were mentioned in the Constitution as powers given to the federal government.  Other matters became debated before the war—land grants to colleges, a protective tariff, the national bank.  When the Republican Party with it Hamiltonian “loose construction” views gained control of the Presidency and both Houses of Congress in 1860, hotheads in the South feared the Republicans would try to stretch the national government’s power to the abolition of slavery (something Lincoln quite plainly said he could not and would not do).  But emotion won and the South seceded.  

Slavery may have been the trigger for secession, but how the Constitution was to be interpreted was the underlying philosophical motivation.  The North, of course,won the war, and more significantly, the philosophical battle over the Constitution.  

Washington, D.C., has since been allowed to define its own powers, and any government given that right will obviously enhance its powers as far as possible.  What can the states, now, do about it?  Their greatest weapon, the threat of secession, has been taken from them.

Advertisement

Mr. Reagan’s words quoted at the beginning of this column are what the men who wrote our Constitution (perhaps Hamilton excluded) intended.  But is this what we have today?  Somewhat.  There still exists certain protections that people not named Donald Trump and not politically conservative have against the federal government.  But please read the Constitution sometime, especially Article 1, Section 8, and the powers given to the President and Supreme Court.  You won’t find 99.9% of whatWashington does today anywhere in the Constitution.  Joe Biden and the Democrats, the Deep State, and Uniparty pay absolutely no attention to our Constitution when formulating their ideas or budgets.  For example:  the welfare/warfare state.  Where is that in the Constitution?  It may, or may not be, a good idea, but that’s irrelevant.  Where does the Constitution give the federal government those powers?  They aren’t there.  The door opened for Washington to ignore its constitutional limitations after the War Between the States.  X+1 implies X+2 implies X+3implies food stamps and Ukraine, ad infinitum.  

Great words from the Gipper—in principle.  But James Madison must be rolling in his grave.  

Check out my substack mklewis929.substack.com for all kinds of material.  There’s lots of good stuff on Leftism, the Founders, etc., along with Biblical studies, so sign up.  Video podcast every week for paid subscribers.  Follow me on Twitter:  @thailandmkl.   Read my western novels, Whitewater , River Bend, Return to River Bend, and Allie’s Dilemma all available on Amazon.   

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos