A federal judge—known for siding with illegal aliens and obstructing Trump-era immigration policy—has been handed a juicy new assignment: a lawsuit over a group chat. Yes, really. As in: military and national security professionals coordinating a strike against terrorists who’ve been hijacking global trade routes. The same judge who tried to stop the deportation of MS-13 killers is now expected to determine whether the United States military broke protocol by… talking to each other in a chat app.
You can’t make this up.
The “Signal Leak” lawsuit, as it’s being dubbed, stems from a Houthi-targeted strike earlier this year. That operation—if we’re being honest—was textbook. Zero civilian casualties. Maximum damage to enemy assets. It was precise, coordinated, effective, and most importantly, successful. In other words, everything the Biden foreign policy team hasn’t been for the past four years.
The media, of course, is hyperventilating over the fact that Trump’s national security team had the audacity to use Signal to communicate. They’re pretending it’s some gross violation of protocol, even though Signal is commonly used by diplomats, journalists, and yes, even current military personnel for secure communication. What they’re really mad about is simple: Trump’s team is back, and they’re doing the job they never could.
Let’s compare for a moment.
GROUP CHAT vs. FAKE INTEL TO START A WAR
The group chat in question? It resulted in a clean strike on a terrorist network that was targeting U.S. and allied shipping vessels. The operation had international support, airtight execution, and no collateral damage. It was a win. The Bush-era intel on Iraq? That led to a two-decade quagmire based on “evidence” that didn’t exist. Thousands of American lives lost. Trillions of dollars spent. Zero WMDs found. One was a strategic, surgical success. The other? A multi-generational foreign policy disaster.
GROUP CHAT vs. BOTCHED AFGHANISTAN EVACUATION
Let’s go down memory lane. 2021. Biden’s team yanked our troops from Afghanistan before getting our people and allies out. The result? Thirteen dead American service members. Billions in military equipment left behind. A re-empowered Taliban executing allies in the street. That was a real failure of military planning, coordination, and chain-of-command. No group chat could’ve saved that incompetence. In contrast, Trump’s security team—yes, the very people in that Signal thread—negotiated terms that kept the Taliban in check and kept American personnel safe. Until Biden blew it all up.
GROUP CHAT vs. OPEN BORDERS MADNESS
While the media obsesses over Signal messages between military professionals, Biden’s team has let in millions of people through our southern border. No vetting. No tracking. No idea where they go, who they are, or what their intentions may be. The cartels are running the show. Fentanyl is flooding American cities. Border towns are overrun. The very same people screaming “security breach” over a chat app are rolling out the red carpet for illegal aliens and potential terrorists. The cognitive dissonance would be laughable if it weren’t so dangerous.
So what’s the real scandal here?
That Trump’s national security team was locked in, aligned, and moving in real time to defend American interests? That the messages show cohesion, not chaos? That unlike the Biden crew, they don’t need to hold a press conference before making a decision—they just get it done?
Here’s what the chat really shows: a unified, competent, focused national security operation that’s centered around one thing—keeping America safe. These aren’t rogue actors. These are seasoned patriots carrying out the will of the Commander-in-Chief. And what’s more, they’re doing it with more strategic clarity and moral resolve than anything we’ve seen in recent years.
This is the team that knows who our enemies are—and doesn’t hesitate to confront them. They’re not interested in symbolic airstrikes or performative press statements. They hit hard, they hit smart, and they don’t miss.
And maybe that’s what terrifies the left.
Because for the first time in four years, America has a national security apparatus that isn’t playing footsie with globalist NGOs, placating Iran, or sending blank checks to Ukraine with no strategy. We’ve got leaders who understand deterrence through strength. Who don’t apologize for defending our interests. Who remember what it means to win.
The people now pretending to faint like Victorian debutantes over a chat app didn’t blink when Biden left babies behind in Kabul. They didn’t object when the administration deleted the terrorist watchlist at the border. They didn’t even flinch when classified documents showed up in Joe Biden’s garage next to his Corvette.
But heaven forbid a Trump advisor drop a message in Signal that says “lock and load.”
If anything, this group chat proves the opposite of what the media wants you to believe. It proves that Trump’s national security team is disciplined, aligned with his vision, and deadly serious about protecting this country. It proves that under Trump, we’ll be stronger for our allies, and more lethal against our enemies.
And maybe that’s the real problem for his critics.
Because it reveals just how weak and reckless they’ve been.
The left is terrified that the adults are back in the room. The ones who actually know how to stop the bad guys without sending your son home in a flag-draped coffin. The ones who understand that peace comes through strength—not hashtags, not virtue signals, and definitely not leaks to the New York Times.
So let me make this plain:
If you’re mad about a group chat that led to a flawless anti-terrorist strike—but not mad about 13 dead Marines, open borders, a Taliban-armed Afghanistan, and endless war based on fake intel—then you’re not serious about national security. You’re just bitter that competence is back in style.
And for the first time in four years, America’s safety is the priority again.
Groupchat THAT.
Join the conversation as a VIP Member