As he read his prepared remarks, Senator Chuck Schumer‘s recent diatribe against Israel seemed like he was competing for best supporting actor in a growing treacherous horror film within the Democratic Party as to who can be more hostile to Israel. Coming from a democratically elected leader and the highest-rankingDemocratic senator, Schumer’s insistence on new elections in Israel was particularly undemocratic.
Calling for a two-state solution, Schumer expressed concern that Prime Minister Netanyahu (Israel) was creating a “de facto single state,” thereby suggesting that Hamas and other Islamist terrorists would legitimately have no reasonable expectation to make peace. In other words, terror is acceptable as long as Israel does what the terrorists don’t like.
Forget the embarrassing mindless repetition of US administration policy whose mantra of a “two state solution” is neither practical nor possible under current circumstances. The fact is that evendiscussing this less than six months after the Hamas massacre in Israel on October 7 is a reward to all terrorists.
As if he were looking at himself in a mirror, parroting a policy that is dangerously stuck in the past, Schumer proclaimed, “The Netanyahu coalition no longer fits the needs of Israel after October 7. The world has changed – radically – since then, and the Israeli people are being stifled right now by a governing vision that is stuck in the past.”
Schumer added that Prime Minister Netanyahu has “lost his way, putting himself in coalition with far-right extremists like [Finance Minister] Bezalel Smotrich and [National Security Minister] Itamar Ben Gvir.” Netanyahu, Schumer announced, “has all too frequently bowed to the demands of extremists” and has let “his political survival take precedence over the best interests of Israel.”
If Schumer’s problem with Netanyahu is the nature of his government, how strange it is that he decided 14 months into the current Netanyahu government, and 160 days into a war thrust on Israel by Hamas, that Israel needed new elections.
Doubling down on offensive, inappropriate, stupidity, Schumer announced that there are four obstacles to peace. He included Netanyahu along with Hamas, Palestinian Authority (PA) President Mahmoud Abbas, and radical right-wing Israelis. Yes, the US Senate Majority Leader equated democratically elected Netanyahu with the terrorists of Hamas, and PA President Abbas, currently in his 18th year of a four-year term.
Did Schumer not realize that in conflating Abbas with Netanyahu, and yet still parroting a two-state solution, in fact there is no legitimate Palestinian Arab leadership capable of reliably instituting a peaceful Palestinian Arab state?
Prophet Schumer announced, by keeping these players in place,“there will never be peace in Israel and Gaza and the West Bank.”
Schumer’s scripted statement comes in the wake of a series of anti-Israel statements by top Democratic leaders including President Biden, and VP Kamila Harris who publicly set up Schumer’s remarks by telling the world that we should not confuse the Israeli people with the Israeli government, somehow, as if one were legitimate, and the other were not.
And all of this is “complemented” by Secretary of State Blinken who made obscene comments about Israel dehumanizing the Palestinian Arabs.
As much as these Democratic party leaders, all seem to be reading from the same script, Senator Schumer remarks were particularly treacherous. Schumer conflated the obstacles to peace by suggesting that Prime Minister Netanyahu and his government were as bad as Hamas, Abbas, and the Palestinian Authority.
Responses to Schumer were robust, coming from across the political spectrum in Israel and the US.Netanyahu’s Likud party pushed back, “Israel is an independent and proud democracy that elected Prime Minister Netanyahu, not a banana republic. It is expected of Senator Schumer to respect Israel’s elected government and not undermine it. This is always true, but even more so during wartime.”
War cabinet minister and opposition leader Benny Gantz wrote “Israel is a robust democracy, and only its citizens will decide its future and leadership. Any external interference on the matter is counter-productive and unacceptable.”
Israeli Ambassador to the US Michael Herzog criticized Schumer, saying that “Israel is a sovereign democracy. It is unhelpful — all the more so as Israel is at war against the genocidal terror organization Hamas — to comment on the domestic political scene of a democratic ally. It is counterproductive to our common goals.”
Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell said “Israel deserves an ally that acts like one,” adding, “Either we respect their decisions, or we disrespect their democracy.”
Calling Schumer’s remarks “inappropriate,” Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson stated, “It’s just plain wrong for an American leader to play such a divisive role in Israeli politics while our closest ally in the region is in an existential battle for its very survival.”
Former US ambassador to Israel David Friedmanderided Schumer’s statement, saying that is disgustingthat “the Senate Majority Leader publicly pushes for regime change in the middle of a war.”
Regarding PA President Abbas, Schumer said that “for there to be any hope of peace in the future, Abbas must step down and be replaced by a new generation of Palestinian leaders who will work towards attaining peace with a Jewish state.” Yet of course, not even dense-minded Schumer would call for actual democratic Palestinian Authority elections, perhaps fearing that by doing so he’d look foolish.
I don’t remember in my life ever hearing such a bold, anti-democratic statement coming from an elected leader of the free world against another democratic leader, much less an ally, or it’s democratic government. Not only is it deeply wrong for an American politician, or anyone else, to stick his nose into domestic affairs of another democratic country, it is counterproductive.
I am not a great fan of Prime Minister Netanyahu, and wish he would’ve stepped down years ago. Nevertheless, hearing such obscene remarks from the Senate majority, leader and other administration leaders make me double down in my support for the Israeli government at this time of war.
I know that I am not alone in hearing such remarks, being offended by them, and embarrassed for the people who made them. Unfortunately, as much as Senator Schumer wants to blame Israel’s Prime Minister for his own personal interests in conducting the war what is clear is that the most important two states for the Democratic Party are not Israel and “Palestine “, but Michigan and Minnesota.
The Democratic party leaders who seem to be vying about who can make the most vile anti-Israel statements don’t understand that short of a full declaration of war by the United States on Israel, the Hamas wing of the Democratic Party will not support the current administration. They are not only wrong on the issues, but they are strategically wrong because short of that, they have already lost the terrorists among them.
Who has really lost its way? Israel, fighting a seemingly never-ending war against genocidal Arabs and Islamists for a century, or Senator Schumer and his Democratic party?
Join the conversation as a VIP Member