Why Again Do We Still Have a Special Relationship With the Tyrannical UK?
Biden DOJ Quietly Dismisses Case Against Two Jordanians Who Tried to Infiltrate Marine...
Is There Trouble Ahead for Pete Hegseth?
Celebrate Diversity (Or Else)!
Journos Now Believe the Liar Trump When Convenient, and Did Newsweek Provide the...
To Vet or Not to Vet
Trump: From 'Fascist' to 'Let's Do Lunch'
Newton's Third Law of Politics
Religious Belief and the 2024 Election
Restoring American Strength and Security with Trump’s Cabinet Picks
Linda McMahon to Education May Choke Foreign Influence Operations on Campus
Unburden Us From the Universities
Watch Jasmine Crockett Go On Rant About White People Over the Abolishment of...
Texas Hands Over Massive Plot of Land to Trump for Deportations
Scott Jennings Offers Telling Points on Democrats' Losses With Young Men
OPINION

Kamala's Defeat Ushers in New, Law-and-Order Future for Cities

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
AP Photo/Ben Curtis

A construction worker, a fisherman and a woman walking by the United Nations were knifed to death in Manhattan in separate, random attacks on Monday by a blood-covered lunatic with a long rap sheet who should not have been loose on the streets.

Advertisement

Three lives lost. Three more reasons to rid this city of Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg.

Pundits say Bragg -- the soft-on crime lefty largely responsible for the mayhem on New York City's streets -- will likely coast to reelection next year.

That would disgrace New York City. But it's not a fait accompli.

True, no Democrat has emerged yet to challenge Bragg in the upcoming June 25 primary. But data from the recent presidential election suggest defeating Bragg is possible.

In that election, 120,916 fewer Manhattan voters cast their ballots for Harris than for Biden in 2020. Trump gained 18,000 of them, but the lion's share of that shortfall were disaffected voters who chose to stay home rather than vote for Harris' uber-left agenda.

Call them Manhattan's vanishing voters. They number as many as 103,000, though probably slightly less because Harris' poorer showing is also in small part the result of the borough's loss of population.

At 103,000, these voters amount to as much as 70% of the entire Manhattan turnout (143,572) for the November 2023 municipal election when the entire city council was elected, and roughly -40% of the Manhattan turnout in the 2021 primary when top city officials were chosen.

Advertisement

This potential voting bloc of Manhattan Democrats, fed up with left-wing extremism, could help elect a law-and-order DA to replace Bragg.

If there's a candidate. Now that the numbers show a sizable shift in Manhattan voting, it's the duty of the city's political decision-makers to back a candidate who will give the criminal-coddling DA a run for his money.

The same seismic shift in urban voting attitudes is occurring across the nation. Urban Democrats are fed up with the crime, mayhem, homeless encampments, drug use and squalor that progressive policies have wreaked on their cities.

On Nov. 5, voters in the bluest areas of California rebelled. They dethroned Oakland Mayor Sheng Thao, Alameda County DA Pamela Price, San Francisco Mayor London Breed and Los Angeles' Soros-backed DA George Gascon. Blue California overall backed Proposition 36 to strengthen drug and shoplifting penalties.

Manhattan voters will have an opportunity to oust Bragg in less than a year. The shift in voter sentiment suggests it's time to seize it.

Citywide election results were even more promising. Trump gained voters. But a far larger number of disaffected Democrats -- that growing reservoir of persuadable purple voters -- stayed home rather than vote for the progressive policies that have doomed their neighborhoods.

Advertisement

Citywide, 573,618 fewer New York City voters cast their ballots for Harris than for Biden in 2020. Trump gained 94,611, but most of the rest sat out the election. Again, the citywide drop in population had some impact, but even so, hundreds of thousands of Democratically inclined voters refused to follow the party leader's leftward lurch.

That's a sizable voting bloc, considering only half a million people total (578,877) turned out for the November 2023 municipal election to elect the entire City Council. These disaffected democrats have the numbers to decide the next New York City election.

Public Advocate Jumaane Williams blames the falloff in votes for Harris on "anti-Blackness and misogyny." That's far-left delirium.

Republican Party State Chairman Ed Cox said voters are fed up with the "ideological experiments" coming out of Washington, D.C. Democrat Mike Gianaris, deputy leader of the state Senate, said "Democrats who voted for Biden didn't vote" this time around.

Journalist Ezra Klein pointed to "the rage I just hear from people in New York ... the sense of disorder rising, not just crime, but homeless encampments, trash on the streets, people jumping turnstiles in subways, crazy people on the streets. You just talk to people and they're mad about it."

Advertisement

That anger isn't going away now that the presidential election is over.

New York's disaffected Democrats should be wooed to support a common-sense mayoral candidate and reject the progressive lunacy of Williams, super-woke Comptroller Brad Lander, democratic socialist Zohran Mamdani and others vying to move the city leftward.

In Manhattan, disaffected Democrats are numerous enough to wage a formidable campaign against Bragg.

There's no better cause. Bragg prosecutes Daniel Perry but allows deranged fiends -- walking time bombs -- with long rap sheets to go free, causing the rest of us to fear getting slashed, punched or shoved onto the tracks. Time to seize this opportunity to oust him

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos