Biden's HHS Sent Kids to Strip Clubs, Where They Were Pimped Out
Trump Has a New Attorney General Nominee
Is This Why Gaetz Withdrew His Name From Consideration for Attorney General?
The Trump Counter-Revolution Is a Return to Sanity
ABC News Actually Attempts to Pin Laken Riley's Murder on Donald Trump
What Was the Matt Gaetz Attorney General Pick Really About?
Is It the End of the 'Big Media Era'?
A Political Mandate in Support of Pro-Second Amendment Policy
Here's Where MTG Will Fit Into the Trump Administration
Liberal Media Is Already Melting Down Over Pam Bondi
Dem Bob Casey Finally Concedes to Dave McCormick... Weeks After Election
Josh Hawley Alleges This Is Why Mayorkas, Wray Skipped Senate Hearing
MSNBC's Future a 'Big Concern' Among Staffers
AOC's Take on Banning Transgenders From Women's Restrooms Is Something Else
FEMA Director Denies, Denies, Denies
OPINION

Chauvin: The Case Against the Mob

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Court TV, via AP, Pool

One of the main arguments being advanced by Eric Nelson, sole attorney for Derek Chauvin in his trial for the murder of George Floyd, is that the hostile crowd itself prevented the officers from attempting to perform CPR in the last minutes of Floyd's life.

Advertisement

Even the prosecution's "use of force" experts admitted repeatedly on cross-examination that a hostile crowd would justify Chauvin keeping Floyd restrained until an ambulance arrived. An officer's duty to provide care is overridden by his duty to keep himself, the suspect and the bystanders safe.

As was evident from the videos (and admitted to by the bystander witnesses), they were shouting obscenities at the police, threatening them with bodily harm and, in a few instances, had to be held back from rushing the officers.

And of course, because of the presence of the angry crowd, the EMTs themselves did not stick around to provide care, but did a "load and scoot," heaving Floyd into the back of the ambulance and driving three blocks to get away from the mob on the street. They didn't even want to work inside an ambulance near this feisty group.

As it becomes increasingly obvious that the belligerent onlookers themselves may have gotten George Floyd killed by creating a dangerous situation for the officers, media commentators leap in to do backup work for the prosecutors by sneering at the idea that the officers might have felt threatened by a few rowdy teenagers.

Advertisement

Oh, the big pansies! So, a few teenagers yelled at the officers. Show me just ONE example of disaffected urban youth going from agitation to brawling!

Here's one! One Saturday morning in May 2019, six teens beat the crap out of an off-duty firefighter on the Upper East Side because he stepped in to defend an elderly couple from the youths' harassment. 


And here's another: A mob in Chicago attacked an older white man in 2016 for voting for Trump. 


This one is outside a church in Memphis in 2016 after services. The instigating event is entirely unknown. 

But the police were armed! Yeah, what are they going to do if one of the bystanders rushed them? Shoot him? Shoot them all?

Here's a video of (armed) cops making an arrest in the middle of a crowd of rowdy teenagers at a carnival two years ago. 


And here's a 2019 video of a mob of students surrounding an (armed) police officer restraining a student. One student kicked him in the face. 


Here's a brawl that broke out in 2017 after a woman on a bus was bumped with a book bag. The mayhem continued with an attack on (armed) police officers called to the scene, who were bitten and spit upon. One boy tried to take an officer's gun. 

Advertisement
So, yes, I see your point, MSNBC, it's completely crazy for the officers to have felt threatened by the agitated crowd of urban youth hurling epithets at them.

At least we can count on our media to report fairly on any case of a black man dying in police custody.

No, my mistake! For important news about America, we turn to the British press. It seems that Floyd had a long list of criminal convictions, including holding a gun to a pregnant woman's belly during a home invasion robbery in Texas. 

You won't read about that in The New York Times! The Times briefly mentioned a "home invasion" in a single article about Floyd last June (27th paragraph -- seriously). I guess they didn't have space to mention Floyd's pistol-whipping a pregnant woman.

Even the Houston Chronicle's major retrospective of Floyd's life skimmed past the violent home invasion in a few sentences about his period of "struggle": "In 2009, Floyd went to prison after pleading guilty to aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon."

That was it, in a deep dive article on Floyd's life that was 1,500 words long.

It seems like an intriguing story to me. How about an interview with the victim, media? Anyone interested? Nah, let's get to the story on Officer Chauvin's taxes!

Advertisement

Yes, the Minnesota Department of Revenue and the Oakdale Police Department have done their part for BLM by poring over Officer Chauvin's state tax returns and are now charging him with "tax fraud." They claim that, over the past five years, Chauvin and his wife underpaid the State of Minnesota about $21,000 in taxes. There's a real clickbait story!

There have been hundreds of news stories on Chauvin's alleged tax fraud. (George Floyd, I assume, was always punctilious about his taxes. Probably an early filer.)

Rioting is good for ratings. Don't expect the media to report the truth.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos